Control designs mapped to requirements
Each control states what it does, who owns it, which requirement it satisfies, and what proves it operates.
Service line 03 · Cybersecurity
The work includes security control design and ownership, system hardening, and identity and access management across Active Directory, Azure, and Microsoft 365.
Who this is for
Most organizations have a policy set. Fewer have controls with a named owner, a stated requirement behind them, and a record showing they operate. The gap between the two is where exam findings come from.
This work suits organizations running Active Directory, Azure, or Microsoft 365 that cannot currently produce an access list, a hardening baseline, or a named owner for a given control.
What the work includes
Deliverables
Each control states what it does, who owns it, which requirement it satisfies, and what proves it operates.
A documented configuration standard per platform, with the exceptions recorded rather than left undiscovered.
Who has access, why, when it was last reviewed, and what should be removed.
How it supports audit readiness
Every control is mapped to the requirement it satisfies, so collecting evidence is a lookup instead of a search. When an examiner asks how access is controlled, the answer is a document that already existed.
The mapping approach is described in more detail on audit-ready IT.
What this is not
Related services
Compliance and risk management, Cloud architecture and operations, IT operations